• đź‘‹ Welcome! If you were registered on Cybertruckownersclub.com as of October 14, 2024 or earlier, you can simply login here with the same username and password as on Cybertruckownersclub.

    If you wish, you can remove your account here.

wtibbit

Well-known member
First Name
Wayne
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
417
Reaction score
27
Location
DFW
Vehicles
Mercedes sedan, Corvette coupe, Cybertruck AWB FS
Occupation
Retired Engineering Program Director
Country flag
What rules? How would they be eased?

Lotsa missing details. Especially for an incoming administration that is talking about erasing the EV buildout.

-Crissa
Your comment helpfully led me to look into this, @Crissa. Here is what I found.

The Federal government has no specific rules regarding self driving vehicles, or as the Federal Transportation Department's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration calls them - Highly Automated Vehicles (HAVs) or Automated Vehicles (AVs) or "Fully Self-Driving Vehicles". Therefore, before anyone's administration will be able to ease rules for self-driving cars, someone will have to approve those rules.

Although there are no approved rules in place, yet, the NHTSA is trying to get some approved. They are currently working to establish four rules regarding Automated Driving System-Equipped Vehicles - a more specific term than AVs or HAVs. Note that these are rules, yet. They are proposed rules; specifically, they are "Advance Notice(s) of Proposed Rule Making" or ANPRMs. The Government does love acronyms. It turns out that the NHTSA reported to Congress on this effort this year and made the report public.

The next two paragraphs summarize The NHTSA's 2024 report to Congress titled "Automated Driving System-Equipped Vehicles". The report describes the four ANPRMs and their efforts to organize and better address AV technology as follows:

"....two (of the ANPRMs) focus on adapting current requirements for AVs (Automated Vehicles) to maintain the current level of safety afforded by FMVSS (Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards) while providing manufacturers the opportunity to develop novel designs. NHTSA's other two rulemakings look toward the future of evaluating AV performance.​
The NHTSA has also put in place research projects on AV safety and established an Advanced and Emerging Technology Division "... to coordinate enforcement activities for driving automation systems and other areas of rapid technological growth." They've also established a Rulemaking Office of Automation Safety to "... develop and manage AV exemptions, special projects ... and regulation and safety standards related to AVs."​

My take on the "ease the rules" news is that there are no rules in place to ease, but an effort to do so might consist of shutting/slowing down the on-going efforts to, a. make sure AVs are as safe as current vehicles and, b., to find a way for the NHTSA to test this. Stopping or slowing that rule-making effort will likely leave it up to the manufacturers, their corporate lawyers, and some soon-to-be-even-more wealthy injury lawyers to sort out the results of having no effective rules in place.

You can read up on this yourself, and get fully informed with the link to their report to Congress, below:

https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.g...utomated-Driving-System-Equipped-Vehicles.pdf
 

Crissa

Well-known member
First Name
Crissa
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Threads
82
Messages
11,802
Reaction score
3,841
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
2014 Zero S, 2013 Mazda 3
Country flag
Not making rules is the same as making it impossible to achieve them. Until there are rules, the robocabs are illegal and can be seized by local officials.

That's a terrible environment in which to invest in them.

-Crissa
 
 
Top