• đź‘‹ Welcome! If you were registered on Cybertruckownersclub.com as of October 14, 2024 or earlier, you can simply login here with the same username and password as on Cybertruckownersclub.

    If you wish, you can remove your account here.

Report: Tesla lays off entire Supercharger team! [Update: Elon Musk says supercharger growth will continue]

Cybertruck2024

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
107
Reaction score
12
Location
Buffalo
Vehicles
Ford Lightning and Model 3
Country flag
So if your phone is broken or has no network, you're stranded.

So if you can't have a credit cars on file with Tesla, you're stranded.

So if you're out of money and need your buddy to pay, you're stranded.

So if your car ages out of network support, you're stranded.

-Crissa
I can't buy my parents tickets to sporting events anymore, they can't figure out mobile ticketing. Rather if my parents are going to an event, I need to go with them.

If gas pumps didn't have a card swipe, my parents wouldn't ever be able to drive again. Just imagine how much backlash there'd be if tomorrow they took away the ability to swipe a card at gas pumps, there'd be riots.
 

fritter63

Well-known member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Threads
23
Messages
1,111
Reaction score
207
Location
Atascadero
Vehicles
2018 Model 3 LR
Occupation
Retired Software Engineer, Woodworker and guitar builder extraordinaire
Country flag
I can't buy my parents tickets to sporting events anymore, they can't figure out mobile ticketing. Rather if my parents are going to an event, I need to go with them.

If gas pumps didn't have a card swipe, my parents wouldn't ever be able to drive again. Just imagine how much backlash there'd be if tomorrow they took away the ability to swipe a card at gas pumps, there'd be riots.
LOL. Had to get gas for the ride on mower yesterday (pretty much the only gas powered thing left in the household). Took me multiple attempts with multiple cards to remember how to insert it correctly..... :cool:
 

Idea Of The Day

Well-known member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Jul 4, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
72
Reaction score
29
Location
Staten Island, NY
Website
www.ideaoftheday.com
Vehicles
2022 Ford F-150 Lightning
Occupation
Software Developer, Vlogger
Country flag
Probably unrelated but here’s an anecdote that had me thinking the management of the Supercharger network could be better: About 14 months ago on Staten Island, a borough of 500k people with only one other 12-stall network, I saw 12 new chargers installed by a major supermarket and highway. It has been inactive the entire time — it never opened. One would think it would be a far shorter amount of time between installation and activation.
Yes... Nor have hey opened the 2 DC chargers in the same lot.

As you know, there are virtually no commercial DC chargers on the Island, just the ones from the Parks Department at the beach.

Looking forward to seeing your CT parked next to my truck for a photo op. :)
 

CTforTC

Member
First Name
Anthony
Joined
Mar 10, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Location
Staten Island, NY
Vehicles
Model S (2), Y, 3
Occupation
Finance
Country flag
Yes... Nor have hey opened the 2 DC chargers in the same lot.

As you know, there are virtually no commercial DC chargers on the Island, just the ones from the Parks Department at the beach.

Looking forward to seeing your CT parked next to my truck for a photo op. :)
Certainly we could use better infrastructure, JC!
 

JBee

Well-known member
First Name
JB
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Threads
14
Messages
3,596
Reaction score
486
Location
Australia
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Occupation
. Professional Hobbyist
Country flag
Is anyone asking the logical questions?

Are Superchargers profitable at all?

There are two elements to this:

1) return on investment
2) power puchase costs

If its low margin, and Tesla is boarding up the windows for a hard time ahead, wouldn't you focus of trimming the least profitable parts of your organisation?

I done a mini study a while ago, and numbers are thin, hence prevalent government subsidies are required to install chargers at all.

Most charging in kWh and $ is done at home, not on the street on a long trip.

It's a weak business model best left for others to do.
 

TwiztOG43

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 2, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
52
Reaction score
14
Location
Las Vegas
Vehicles
Tesla Model Y Performance, Tesla Model Y LR
Country flag
Is anyone asking the logical questions?

Are Superchargers profitable at all?

There are two elements to this:

1) return on investment
2) power puchase costs

If its low margin, and Tesla is boarding up the windows for a hard time ahead, wouldn't you focus of trimming the least profitable parts of your organisation?

I done a mini study a while ago, and numbers are thin, hence prevalent government subsidies are required to install chargers at all.

Most charging in kWh and $ is done at home, not on the street on a long trip.

It's a weak business model best left for others to do.
No it’s not. Superchargers should be seen as a loss leader. Besides the tech in the cars itself, the only reason I have bought teslas, recommended them to friends and family is because of the supercharger network. Let’s face it, majority of the fear in EVs is range anxiety.

Sure most of the time you will be charging at home, but majority of the time people will stress about the couple times a year they will road trip, or the few times they forget to charge at home and knowing that there are plenty of super chargers near by to recharge gets rid of that anxiety. It’s just like the specs of the truck, such as towing capacity/range. Only needed for a few occasions, besides the outliers.

If you leave it to other companies such as electrify America, what do you think the user experience will be like? I have used them, and they are not as streamlined as Tesla superchargers. Some outright don’t work, finicky connections, heavy cables and shitty locations in a Walmart parking lot where you might have been blocked off by someone who thinks it’s okay to park there.

Superchargers should not be seen as a profit margin but a loss leader, similar to Costco rotisserie chickens or the hotdog. It may not be making a profit directly, but it will keep customers from going with something else knowing the infrastructure is there to support the product your buying.

And when you fire the whole damn team, you cannot say you are expanding because you want to be more “hardcore”. Just look at what a dumpster fire and echo chamber Twitter “X” has become.

Furthermore, sure I get layoffs are necessary, but to what extent? Of course you want to appease Wall Street, but I would think twice about working for Tesla in the future knowing you have no job security regardless if you are valued asset to the team, since the whole team was cut anyway.
 

JBee

Well-known member
First Name
JB
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Threads
14
Messages
3,596
Reaction score
486
Location
Australia
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Occupation
. Professional Hobbyist
Country flag
No it’s not. Superchargers should be seen as a loss leader. Besides the tech in the cars itself, the only reason I have bought teslas, recommended them to friends and family is because of the supercharger network. Let’s face it, majority of the fear in EVs is range anxiety.

Sure most of the time you will be charging at home, but majority of the time people will stress about the couple times a year they will road trip, or the few times they forget to charge at home and knowing that there are plenty of super chargers near by to recharge gets rid of that anxiety. It’s just like the specs of the truck, such as towing capacity/range. Only needed for a few occasions, besides the outliers.

If you leave it to other companies such as electrify America, what do you think the user experience will be like? I have used them, and they are not as streamlined as Tesla superchargers. Some outright don’t work, finicky connections, heavy cables and shitty locations in a Walmart parking lot where you might have been blocked off by someone who thinks it’s okay to park there.

Superchargers should not be seen as a profit margin but a loss leader, similar to Costco rotisserie chickens or the hotdog. It may not be making a profit directly, but it will keep customers from going with something else knowing the infrastructure is there to support the product your buying.

And when you fire the whole damn team, you cannot say you are expanding because you want to be more “hardcore”. Just look at what a dumpster fire and echo chamber Twitter “X” has become.

Furthermore, sure I get layoffs are necessary, but to what extent? Of course you want to appease Wall Street, but I would think twice about working for Tesla in the future knowing you have no job security regardless if you are valued asset to the team, since the whole team was cut anyway.
I don't have a problem with the illogical fear of range anxiety, and I live in Australia where there are a lot less SC. Sure having the "best" charger network is a selling point, but how long would it take for Tesla to lose that title? When are there "enough" chargers?

But there are a few things inside of this, that people are just glossing over.

There is a real position that there are "enough" chargers, for now at least, to still sell Teslas, so increasing the number SC's is not a priority to increase demand. Sure "advertising" abandoning the charging division, is not smart, but in the end, that doesn't change the underlying numbers.

The points here are that chargers are not that cheap to manufacture, but even more importantly, chargers are notoriously high peak demand, which means that the rate of return on the network connection capacity is poor to begin with, and only gets worse with poor TOU.

Network connections are also not getting cheaper, neither are transformers, copper, locations, let alone peak electricity, so electrical networks are not particularly interested in promoting the headache they cause for network balancing, especially when they are expected to increase the charge rates to v4.

This leads to the high electrical costs being charged, which also means that clients are less inclined to use a SC in the first place and avoid them as much as they can.

The combination of these leads to a regressive downwards spiral, in that the less people use public chargers, meaning they become even less profitable. Increasing EV ranges also means less chargers are required.

Tesla opening their chargers to other EV manufacturers might actually be because they needed to improve Tesla charger utilization, and offset some cost.

And that means laying off the charging team and reducing the SC deployments could well be a simple fiscal consequence of cutting out a un-profitable department and to avoid rising costs, especially considering we're heading full steam into a serious global market correction.
 

Sjohnson20

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
176
Reaction score
14
Location
Florida
Vehicles
Cybertruck AWD, Model Y
Country flag
The superchargers for sure aren’t profitable. But yeah Tesla got big partly because they had the superchargers. I can say for me it was one of the factors in buying a Tesla. But I also think at this point there are enough locations. Of course there’s probably some areas not covered. But when I got my Model 3, there was 1 that was 20 miles away. Now there’s probably more than 10 locations near me.
 

CyberGus

Well-known member
First Name
Gus
Joined
May 22, 2021
Threads
58
Messages
4,506
Reaction score
1,764
Location
Austin, TX
Website
www.timeanddate.com
Vehicles
1981 DeLorean, 2024 Cybertruck
Occupation
IT Specialist
Country flag
So if your phone is broken or has no network, you're stranded.

So if you can't have a credit cars on file with Tesla, you're stranded.

So if you're out of money and need your buddy to pay, you're stranded.

So if your car ages out of network support, you're stranded.

-Crissa
I don't think anyone is arguing against POS terminals as a concept, but Tesla does not need to be the one to implement it. Virtually all the other charge networks have on-site payment, so there are options.

That said, it seems to me that implementing POS payment for Superchargers should be simple. A single kiosk per site would be able to accept payment and activate the appropriate stall, basically a Coke machine that dispenses kW. It could probably be an actual Coke machine lol.


P.S. Now that you mention it, I should probably add another payment method to my Tesla account. If I must report my card stolen/missing, it is invalidated for all attached services until a new one is issued.
 

pricedm

Well-known member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Feb 17, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
191
Reaction score
24
Location
Denver, Colorado, USA
Vehicles
2023 Tesla Model Y LR. Volvo XC70 T6 retired 9/23
Occupation
IT
Country flag
LOL. Had to get gas for the ride on mower yesterday (pretty much the only gas powered thing left in the household). Took me multiple attempts with multiple cards to remember how to insert it correctly..... :cool:
LOL...I left my Tesla at my parents' house so I could drive my dad's ICE truck back to my home (400 mile trip). I was in a panic looking for my credit card as I was about to depart on my gasoline-fueled trip.

Ditch the gas mower! Ego or Ryobi are awesome.
 

pricedm

Well-known member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Feb 17, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
191
Reaction score
24
Location
Denver, Colorado, USA
Vehicles
2023 Tesla Model Y LR. Volvo XC70 T6 retired 9/23
Occupation
IT
Country flag
Colorado NEVI funding 2024Q1: $22 million for 46 charging stations.
Average cost non-Tesla DC chargers: $121,323 per port (24 200 kw or less and 6 350 kw)
Average cost Tesla DC chargers: $41,183 per port (all 250 kw).

This is why Tesla needs to continue leading in the fast charging space.
 

JBee

Well-known member
First Name
JB
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Threads
14
Messages
3,596
Reaction score
486
Location
Australia
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Occupation
. Professional Hobbyist
Country flag
Colorado NEVI funding 2024Q1: $22 million for 46 charging stations.
Average cost non-Tesla DC chargers: $121,323 per port (24 200 kw or less and 6 350 kw)
Average cost Tesla DC chargers: $41,183 per port (all 250 kw).

This is why Tesla needs to continue leading in the fast charging space.
Is that for everything, including the network connection and transformers? Or is that just for the Tesla side charge stations etc?

Because MW scale network connections and transformers are not that cheap.
 

HaulingAss

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2020
Threads
10
Messages
3,460
Reaction score
669
Location
Washington State
Vehicles
2010 F-150, 2018 Model 3 P, FS DM Cybertruck
Country flag
That reporting was accurate. It did not say the vehicle was being cancelled. It said the vehicle was being deprioritized in favor of the robotaxi (which was true). Musk reversed himself after the stock got pulverized and reprioritized it.
Musk didn't reverse himself, he said the original report was a lie from the get-go. And his actions since the report came out make the report look like the fiction it always was.
 

SSonnentag

Well-known member
First Name
Shawn
Joined
Feb 24, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
294
Reaction score
61
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
2018 MX and 2023 MYP
Occupation
IT Specialist
Country flag
Payment kiosks are essential to support older vehicles, especially ones that are out of manufacturer support, and ones owned by people who are locked out of having credit.
I can't agree with the need for payment kiosks. Older vehicles require an adapter that could do the handshake identification in cases where the vehicle isn't capable. Kiosks are notorious for needing frequent maintenance.
 

HaulingAss

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2020
Threads
10
Messages
3,460
Reaction score
669
Location
Washington State
Vehicles
2010 F-150, 2018 Model 3 P, FS DM Cybertruck
Country flag
I too disagree with Crissa here. “Musk needs go” is a silly emotional reaction we see far too often online.
Exactly. There are two categories of people that want Musk out of the picture:

1) Those who want to slow down electrification
2) Those who have been convinced by #1 (above) that Elon is slowing down electrification.

No single person has done more, and is doing more, to transition us away from fossil fuels than Elon Musk. That's why they want him gone. The fake noise is becoming deafening.
 
 
Top