JBee
Well-known member
- First Name
- JB
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2019
- Threads
- 14
- Messages
- 3,596
- Reaction score
- 486
- Location
- Australia
- Vehicles
- Cybertruck
- Occupation
- . Professional Hobbyist
Let alone that most hydrogen is made from methane (natural gas) in the first place.There have been many evaluations of hydrogen-based fuel cell vehicles over the years. Apart from the volatility of hydrogen, the simple fact is that it takes electricity to produce hydrogen and that hydrogen is used to make electricity to power an otherwise electric drivetrain. So losses are simply compounded over a BEV solution. In order for hydrogren-based fuel cell vehicles to be better than BEVs the source of electricity to produce the hydrogen would have to be better than for BEVs, but at present time it is more likely that BEV electricity could be acquired through renewable resources than hydrogen, and most hydrogen-production methods are quite dirty. It is hard to imagine BMW, Toyota, or anyone really coming up with a hydrogen-based fuel cell vehicle that would be even close to BEVs, and so I cannot believe that it makes any difference, in the short/long run, what these manufacturers say.
Better off using the methane in a fuel cell straight out without converting it and having to overcome the issues with boiloff etc and energy density and distribution.
Bio-methane from biomass is the only RE that is net CO2 reducing, as releasing bio-methane adds more temperature forcing than CO2, so combusting bio-methane into CO2 results in a 20x reduction.