Usachris
Member
- First Name
- Christopher
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2020
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 5
- Location
- Costa Mesa, CA
- Vehicles
- Cybertruck
- Occupation
- Retired
Repost?
One of the conditions reported joining the board was to not own more than 14.x %. I cannot remember the exact figure.He's been trimming his boardroom duties, maybe he didn't like the schedule?
-Crissa
Yeah, he's probably gonna buy the whole thing.One of the conditions reported joining the board was to not own more than 14.x %. I cannot remember the exact figure.
unsure if that had anything to do with anything. Since I was late to the party, I did not buy any Twitter shares. So, I am watching with popcorn what Monday’s movement will be. I just don’t know.
Twitter-verse?Yeah, he's probably gonna buy the whole thing.
Something weird is going on and I don't like the distraction if he gets in trouble with the SEC.He's been trimming his boardroom duties, maybe he didn't like the schedule?
-Crissa
Apparently the board was trying to "manage" EM and his free speech.Something weird is going on and I don't like the distraction if he gets in trouble with the SEC.
Elon's tweet to xxx celebrity to tweet more more would only serve to lower the value as if he wanted to buy more. By not joining the board he can increase his stake to more than 14.9% but with less? influence.
Obviously Elon doesn't need the money. I think he is trying to curtail extremism. The problem is toning down the rhetoric is boring and not good for sales/volume. If he sacrifices Twitter in the name of curtailing extremism something else will just take its place. (as it tends to every 10 years anyway).
Jumping to conclusions or cited article?Apparently the board was trying to "manage" EM and his free speech.
As expected they didn't get far.
Twitter and news feed. Being part of the board would of limited him to 14.9%. Now he can do what he wants.Jumping to conclusions or cited article?
Um I hope I know what a director does, I've been one 5 times, currently am one of two companies. A director is responsible to "direct" the company. Policy is only a small partial function. The main ones are compliance, productivity and profitability, in particular to act in the best interests of the company, as its own corporate body, and not their own.....That's not what I said, and you don't seem to understand how directors work. Directors direct policy.
-Crissa
So... policy, policy, and policy. Nice comeback you got there, agreeing with me by disagreeing 9-9Um I hope I know what a director does, I've been one 5 times, currently am one of two companies. A director is responsible to "direct" the company. Policy is only a small partial function. The main ones are compliance, productivity and profitability, in particular to act in the best interests of the company, as its own corporate body, and not their own.
Do you have a problem with authority? Company and director compliance does not need and is not subject to company policy. It is against the corporations act to not run a company profitably.So... policy, policy, and policy. Nice comeback you got there, agreeing with me by disagreeing 9-9
And if he increases his shareholding to ten percent, he becomes beholden to the same kind of SEC scrutiny. Bit by bit.
-Crissa